Assignments with Ethical Concerns

This study investigates an axiomatic approach to in-kind assignment problems with a single-unit demand such as triage. We consider multiple ethical criteria regarding which agents should be assigned that conflict one another. To make compromises between criteria, we introduce two methods for configuring social choice rules map from various who are slots: the method of procedure and aggregation. From inter-problem regularities, demonstrate characterization results, implying emphasizes consistent respect individual across problems, whereas aggregation problems. These incompatible because only dictatorships induced by both methods. show is superior when can utilize detailed information about concerns cardinality comparability, while there severe informational limitations.